Monday, October 6, 2008 Last Update: 12:20 p.m.
Overcast: Currently 66° F
Dow: 9616.68 -708.7

Poor Richard’s Almanac: Or the Shame About Roeper.

A few weeks ago, friends of the late Mike Royko gathered at Wrigley Field to observe the ten year anniversary of his death. Royko was a lifelong fan of the Cubs, a team that he often lampooned and ridiculed. After seeing the Cubs manage to make a final World Series appearance during his adolescence, Royko watched the team as it bottomed out completely. Royko bemoaned the clumsy players that masqueraded as professional athletes on the Chicago roster, frequently venting his anger and disgust in print. He took solace by playing sixteen inch softball and was inducted into the Chicago Softball Hall of Fame. It was altogether fitting and proper that his family and friends assembled at the Friendly Confines to toast his memory.

Thinking of Royko, put me in mind of his final years writing columns for the Tribune. It was not an entirely happy employer/employee relationship. Royko had taken refuge at the Tribune after Rupert Murdoch had acquired The Chicago Sun-Times. Royko refused to work for the publisher that he derisively referred to as “the alien.” This insult stemmed from the fact that Murdoch had not yet obtained American citizenship. Moving to the Tribune was the second such dislocation in Royko’s career: he had to shift his column to the Sun-Times when publisher Marshall Field IV folded the Daily News.

In his waning years, Royko was once asked to survey the field of Chicago newspaper writers and to identify his likely successor as the dean of local columnists. Amazingly enough, or so it seems in retrospect, Royko pointed to Richard Roeper as a comer with potential. Royko felt “the kid” had the necessary talent.

Richard Roeper? Seriously?

While Royko did not have a crystal ball to consult, it seems clear that John Kass is probably the leading columnist in Chicago today. Kass is an old school professional. He is literally a throwback to an early age of commentary that many Chicagoans can relate to. One can hardly fault Royko, however, for predicting Roeper might be his heir apparent. Over the course of the intervening decade, something happened to Roeper’s career arc as a columnist. He elected to go Hollywood and become the protégé of Roger Ebert.
This in turn exacted a toll on his newspaper column.

Unlike Kass, Roeper seldom if ever tackles political subjects in print unless it is something as safe as bashing the president. Roeper cannot be found at mayoral press conferences or scrutinizing the actions of the Illinois General Assembly. Politics is so boring. Roeper occupies his time making pointed observations on the pop culture and chronicling the activities of Brittany Spears and Lindsay Lohan. Somehow, I doubt that researchers will be reading his vapid columns on microfilm in years to come.

Roeper has continually sought out opportunities to moonlight from his day job. For a time, he was a radio host and he has spent the past several years as a movie reviewer on television. He has cultivated the image of the coolest cat in the room. He seems to own the title of the resident metrosexual on the staff of the Sun-Times. Just ask his admiring colleague, Neil Steinberg, for confirmation.

Roeper seems so taken with the pop culture that his recent columns read like a series of Jerry Seinfeld comedy monologues put into print. Roeper seems incapable of producing a complete column on any single subject. His random observations jump from one topic to another as easily as a bored television viewer hitting the buttons on a remote control. While I would hesitate to question his talents as a writer, looking at his journalistic career as a whole, the results thus far lead one to ask “Is that all there is?”

While the late Royko and John Kass would sometimes focus their energies on exposing corruption and waste at City Hall, Roeper is more comfortable reporting on starlets in designer gowns walking down the red carpet in advance of the Academy Awards. What a waste!
**
Daniel J. Kelley is a curmudgeon and a contributor to The Chicago Daily Observer

Commentary:

1

Pat Hickey says:

Ray Coffey was ten times the writer Royko ever hoped to be and three hundred times tougher.

Roeper is a serious lightweight; Steinberg is true journalist in the Ray Coffey tradition and Kass is the best humorist since Finley Peter Dunne.

October 10, 2007 at 12:19 p.m.
2

Dan Kelley says:

Today, in another multiple choice column, Roeper noted that had the Cubs won the NL flag in 1984 that the World Series would have to be played in Comiskey Park. He imagined what a revolting that development might have been.

Of course, the paragraph omitted to refer to the fact that Cubs had used Comiskey Park as their home field during the 1918 World Series in which was won by the Boston Red Sox.

October 10, 2007 at 3:40 p.m.
3

Mark Eldridge says:

I don't know what you are talking about Mr. Kelley. Since I have been reading the Roeper Doper articles it seems I'm never tired anymore. I rather enjoy the endless parade of snippets of information regarding the patron Saints of the lost cause. Brittany, Lindsay, Wacko Jacko, the list goes on and on. It is through them that I realized that easy living and money are not the elixir I was looking for in life, on the contrary, they are the stuff of poison. How we would know how well off we are if we did not have Mr. Roeper regularly telling tales the stars narcissistic drunkenness and cruelty, and just how good they are looking while pursuing their own images as they gaze into the reflective lake of life. No sir, he in his own way, is illustrating for us all how not to be shallow. You just are not adept enough to see his brilliance.

October 10, 2007 at 4:44 p.m.
4

Lee Leichentritt says:

Mike Royko was a one in a million writer Chicago will have to wait a a very long time before we are lucky enough to see someone who can compare to Mike.
Kass and Roeper are second stringers at best and thats all I have to say.

October 10, 2007 at 4:57 p.m.
5

Bob Ebersold says:

The newspapers' audiences are much different now, and unfortunately, the customer is still always right. Many younger folks get their news from other sources, such as the internet or cable TV. The few people left reading the paper choose either the Tribune or Sun-Times based on some special interest, such as horse racing or the stock market. They cannot possibly find the time to read the whole paper, especially on Sundays.

I really am not convinced that the columnists are expressing their true feelings in today's newspapers. They may just be competing for the few readers that remain.

October 10, 2007 at 5:15 p.m.
6

CDOBs Editors says:

The race to the bottom in the local newspapers brings in a great dilemma in circulation. The Financial Times and WSJ are actually seeing circulation rise while generally skipping stories about Spears, Lohan, and Anna Nicole. Yet, the Trib and SunTimes swear up and down that their readers want more celebrity gossip and scandal. At some point, the local papers will notice that suicide is not much of a business strategy. But until then, of course I suggest to stick to the Chicago Daily Observer.

October 10, 2007 at 7:41 p.m.
7

Dutch Dykemann says:

2 "Thumbs Up" used to be a good gauge of what videos were of worth. I am talking about way back when before Blockbuster and others sucked the life out of the Mom & Pop shops.

October 10, 2007 at 8:07 p.m.

Comments are closed for this entry