As an American Jew I find that the most deceitful, depraved and disgusting sub-campaign of the presidential season is the viral e-mail and blogging attack on Barack Obama that characterizes him as an enemy of Israel if not Judaism itself.
This campaign goes far beyond the false but persistent rumor that he is a Muslim—as if that in itself were a criminal position—but tries to put him in the political bed of every enemy of Israel and America of the past half century.
Some of the slime that enters my inbox makes Joseph McCarthy look like the chairman of the ACLU.
The most recent, well-circulated missive comes from one Leon A. Weinstein of California who offers as his bona fides the claim that he is a Russian immigrant who first lived in Israel before coming to the States, and elsewhere describes himself as a marketing expert who has pledged to do all in his power to stop Obama.
OK—that’s his right. He is apparently a conservative Republican with lots of legitimate disagreements with the essentially liberal Democratic candidate.
But look at some of Weinstein’s—and others—arguments: Obama, he says, is endorsed by “a scaring host of anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli people and organizations” including: “Hamas Terrorist Organization,” “Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades,” “Socialist Party USA (Marxist Political Party)” “Raul Castro (Hard-line Communist Leader, Cuba)” and “Daniel Ortega (Marxist Sandinista Leader, Nicaragua)” to say nothing of Louis Farrakhan, whom Obama has rejected, renounced and denounced. (All the parenthetical descriptions above are Weinstein’s.)
Where did Weinstein get such information?
On the Internet, he acknowledges.
But this tissue of guilt by associations, apparently, is not sufficiently “scaring.” Weinstein goes on to identify a host of actual Obama supporters who have varying positions on the Middle East and misrepresents both their ties to the candidate, as well as their positions.
Weinstein charges that Obama asked Zbigniew Brzezinski to be his “chief political advisor”—a lie. The former National Security Advisor is simply one of many secondary and tertiary foreign policy advisors.
Brzezinski’s sin? He advocated talks with Hamas—talks such as Israel has been undergoing for several months now!
In a major howler, Weinstein tries to make the arch cold-warrior Brzezinski into a Communist sympathizer by taking some odd quote out of context.
And so it goes with half a dozen other figures Weinstein cites.
The goal of these long-winded, demonstrably dishonest rants obviously is to discredit Obama as anti-Israel and his Jewish supporters as self-haters—the ultimate smear of any Jew who does not toe a 250 percent hard line in support of Israel with no sympathy for any Arabs or Palestinians.
It is religion used as a weapon in a way that would make Jerry Falwell envious.
The fact is, Obama already toes a pretty hard line in Israel’s favor. One arbiter of such is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful Jewish lobby, which accords Obama a 100 percent pro-Israel rating.
More fact: many progressive Jewish organizations, which do not share AIPAC’s hard-line thinking, have criticized Obama for going overboard in AIPAC’s direction, as in his calling for an undivided Jerusalem as capital of Israel.
Obama has plenty of Jewish support. In the primaries he won about 43 percent of the Jewish vote against Clinton and others who have spent decades courting the tiny but potent Jewish base. Compare that to 39 percent of the rest of the white vote.
Even Sen. Joe Lieberman’s stepson Ethan Tucker—a rabbi—is an Obama endorser.
Conservative Republicans have long tried to use Israel as a wedge issue to peel Jewish voters away from their solid Democratic roots.
With something less than 3 percent of the population, Jews cast nearly twice that number of votes and are a major political funding source.
Want to talk political power? With that small percentage of the population, Jews constitute 13 percent of the U.S. Senate, comprising 9 Democrats, 2 Independents who caucus with the Democrats and 2 Republicans.
Little wonder the Republicans want to break up this powerful voting bloc.
Ever since Franklin Roosevelt got 90 percent of the Jewish vote, only one Republican ever got 40 percent—Dwight Eisenhower. Ronald Reagan came close with 36 percent.
Bill Clinton got the vote back to 80 percent; Al Gore got 79 percent and John Kerry 76 percent.
With Obama’s unusual background, odd name and the backdrop of race, GOP strategists see a potential of eating further into the constituency. Guys like Leon A. Weinstein among others don’t seem to care how they accomplish the goal.
The whispering campaign about Obama being a secret Muslim was denounced by Jewish leaders of all stripes—most recently by Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York.
Earlier in the year a letter signed by groups ranging from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee and National Council of Jewish Women said “…many in our community have received hateful e-mails that use falsehood and innuendo to mischaracterize Senator Obama’s religious beliefs and who he is….
“These tactics attempt to drive a wedge between our community and a presidential candidate based on false attacks and innuendo based on religion….
“Attempts of this sort to mislead and inflame voters should not be part of our political discourse and should be rebuffed by all who believe in our democracy.”
Now it’s time for Bloomberg and the rest of Jewish leadership to stand up again and denounce the political treachery of the Weinsteins and those who falsely use the issue of religion and the Jewish homeland to accomplish their political ends.
_____________________________
Don Rose, a veteran liberal strategist, is a regular columnist for The Chicago Daily Observer.
thebob.bob says:
I agree, the pandering to the anti-Muslim fanatics by distorting Obama's background and upbringing is disgusting. OMG, pictures of him with family members and participation in a religious ceremony! What would it mean if a convert to Christianity from Judaism were to be photographed wearing a yarmulke while attending the bar-mitzvah of a relative???????? Obviously the actions of a liar and deceiver! The visceral hate must be confronted and denounced.
Jeremy says:
@Dan Kelley
You may have said what you said in all innocence, but people like you are the source of the problem.
You point to lies and distortions in his autobiography, but then never state what they are. He has said in plain terms both in his autobiography and in press meetings that his step-father is or was a Muslim and that he went to a (nominally) Muslim school in Indonesia for a bit.
Michael says:
There is, undoubtedly, a lot of animosity concerning the candidacy of Senator Obama.. Some of it is based on emotions, which one can do little about and some on suspicions that can be readily alleviated. These suspicions include doubts about Senator Obama’s future policies in view of his political actions in the past. These doubts cannot be alleviated purely based on his current political rhetoric (which like that of any other politician are to be taken with a large grain of salt). They also cannot be alleviated by listening to Senator Obama’s supporters and apologists who attack the Senator’s critics ad personem rather than refuting the critiques by hard facts. A case in point is the Islamic upbringing of the Senator in his ten or eleven years of life, which is being obscured by him and by his campaign. Suspicion were also raised about the place of birth of the Senator. The recently publicized forged birth certificate of the Senator does not alleviate these suspicions but significantly enhances them.
In short, people would respect Senator Obama much more, whether they agree with his ideological stance or not, if he showed complete frankness about his past and would document these statements with irrefutable hard evidence. People also ask why did the press not interview his grand mother, his sister, his teachers and his classmates? All this enhances suspicions, justifiably or not.
Go says:
Jeremy
"went to a (nominally) Muslim school in Indonesia for a bit"
is 2 years.
Went to a catholic school for 3 (registered as a Muslim).
This is not i have nothing to do with Islam. (add in brother Roy and cousins and half brothers in Africa)
also by the way Muslims believe that Jesus was a great profit and a person to take great "comfort" in.
I am an infidel because "Jesus is my Lord and Savior"
dsfd says:
Its truly amazing how Israel and Jews can make or break a candidate. There are probably more Kenyans in America then there are Jews. So what gives here. There are probab,y more Phillipinos in AMerica. Definitely more Americans, yet our media and the "establishment" seem to push Israel and Jewish American interests above everyone else in this nation. I dont get it, I actually do but then I would be called an antisemite. Its not Jewish votes, its Jewish money and that is something the media neglects to tell everyone.
Dan Kelley says:
There is not time and space in which to note all of the misstatements and distortions in Obama's autobiography and in the statements issued by the candidate and his campaign. As Michelle Malkin has pointed out, if Obama was a Republican rather than a media darling, he'd be compared to Dan Quayle on a daily basis. How stupid was it for Obama to claim in a speech that his parents were moved to marry after the civil rights marches in Alabama and that he was born soon afterwards? Another example of his tendency to dissemble is the grandiose claims that he has made about his father. Although this man did serve in the Kenyan government bureaucracy, he was not the model of civic virtue that his abandoned son describes. He was a notorious womanizer and an alcoholic. He was in several drunk driving accidents, including one that crippled him and caused him to lose his legs and another which killed him. This is another story that was reported in Europe, but ignored in the USA.
Bobby says:
Obama has the support of the extreme left which is viciously anti-Israel and anti-Semetic. The debate shouldnt be about Obama but the wider issue oif the lefts relationship to Israel. In Australia and Canada the left wing parties have turned against Israel in a bid to attract Muslim support. The same thing will happen in the USA. The problem with American Jews is their Jewishness is defined not by their support of Israel but by the liberalism. There will be a massive identity crisis among American Jews in the next few years as the holocaust generation finally dies off and is replaced by post modern leftists who wish nothing more than to see the destruction of the Jewish state.
leon weinstein says:
How interesting that someone prints an answer to an article ... without printing an article itself. In other words, you know about this person who commited "Political Treachery" from another person's words. What a strange people those Americans are. A frind of mine said that he doesn't like how Barbara Streisand sings. I asked "where did you hear her?", and he answered, "No, I didn't hear Barbara, my wife sang me her songs".
The most important issue of this election however is not Jews or Israel, Muslim Obama or Bleck Power Christian, or even not when he lied about withdrowal from Iraq and a host of other issues. The most important issue is - Obama wants to exchange capitalistic system that created America for a socialistic system. It is universally true that socialism kills prosperity, but it;s ideas so apealing that generation after generation best and brightest saying "Previous guys didn't succeed, since they did something wrong, but we wil succeed...". Sorry, but we are talking about end of this country as we know it. It was / is the best place in the world for humans, and millions upon millions of people trying to get in is can attest to that. But we will desrtroy what we have because we want Greater Good.
leon weinstein says:
In the article above there is an interesting statement" More fact: many progressive Jewish organizations, which do not share AIPAC’s hard-line thinking, have criticized Obama for going overboard in AIPAC’s direction, as in his calling for an undivided Jerusalem as capital of Israel" -
this is not true. Obama already backed from this statement, day after he erroneously made it.
Regarding Internet and sourcing the web - i do not know anyone who does it differently today. You go on Internet, read newspapers, read speaches, comments, visit libraries, write to people which more knowlege then an average guy... and get your info. Why in the above article searchin the web is considered "bad" I do not understand?
One more thing - I am not conservative republican. I am not republican at all. I am not a member of any party, but... for eight years I was a member of the Democtaric party, and have three or four letters from Clinton and Gore thanking me for various things I did (in their opinion important) for the "cause'.
The author of the above article is not very good journalist and not very smart person. But this is OK, not everyone shall be good journalist or smart person. What we shall not do - is listen to bad journalists and not very smart people. Oh yes, probably the editor is not very good editor and not very smart person as well. But this explains why the journalist is printed in this newspaper. Or may be they are relatives? That would explain it.
Dan Kelley says:
There is some fairly vile material floating around in cyberspace about Obama. But what gives some of this material some lukewarm credibility with the bigots is how clumsily the candidate has addressed the issue. His autobiography is filled with sanitized explanations, half truths, and, in a few instances, complete fabrications. Obama continually denies having an Islamic background, but European newspapers (particularly the London tabloids) have articles and photographs of him with his family members who self-identify as Muslims and acknowledge that Obama has participated in a few religious ceremonies with them and has on a few occasions dressed in Islamic clothing. In the USA, Obama has attempted to minimize his background and distorted the truth repeatedly (read anything that he has written about his Kenyan father) so often that it only opens him up to further questioning. This is problematic for Obama's candidacy and I doubt that it is going to go away before November.