Friday, January 9, 2009 Last Update: 1:51 p.m.
Overcast: Currently 29° F
Dow: 8599.18 -143.28

Democrats and The Incumbent Media vs. Palin

Wow. In all the years I’ve reported on politics and political campaigns, this one stands out as wild – not only for the surprises presented by candidates, but for the lack of balance exhibited by many in the media in reporting on those surprises. The most recent chapter of imbalance surrounds Alaska Governor Sara Palin as Senator John McCain’s running mate for Vice President.

No sooner had Senator McCain announced Governor Palin as his Vice Presidential choice, the attacks began. They said, unlike the democrats’ Vice Presidential candidate Senator Joe Biden and his chairmanship of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Governor Palin didn’t understand foreign relations issues. They said she wasn’t ready for such a high office – “too inexperienced”.

Let’s look at her foreign affairs judgment compared with Senator Joseph Biden’s. Yes, Biden chairs the Foreign Relations Committee; but, Israel’s Army Radio reported this week of a past “closed door meeting” Biden had with Israeli officials where he told the Israelis that “economic sanctions would be futile against Iran” and went on to add that “Israel will have to reconcile itself with the nuclearization of Iran.”

Is this the kind of judgment the free world wants? Does Biden forget that Iran’s lunatic leader has vowed to wipe Israel off the map?
Perhaps Governor Palin’s common sense is the better route.
Even after Governor Palin’s incredible speech to the Republican convention, the attacks continued. She was called “strident”, “sarcastic”, “shrill”, – and, from the Obama campaign, just a “small town Mayor”. Some national pundits even suggested that old sexist bromide: Governor Palin should be staying at home with her children and, as a mother of children; the job would be too much for her. After listening to her rousing speech, the pundits and reporters focused on the fact that she “worked with a speech writer” – ignoring the fact that Obama, Biden and every other political candidate works with speech writers—and Obama and Biden were even found plagiarizing the words and works of others.

Let’s look at the attacks on Governor Palin in the light of history. Let’s look at the claim that she was strident and shrill. It seems to be a criticism singularly held for women. It was used against Hillary Clinton. It was used against England’s Margaret Thatcher. And, regarding the sexist claims that, as a mother, she was ill equipped to focus on the job, the same was thrown at Margaret Thatcher when that great lady first ran for high office. History shows the pundits were wrong in their sexism and the world is better off for her service.

Governor Palin answered the Obama camp’s condescension of her “small town” by explaining the difference between Obama as a “community organizer” and a “small town mayor” by saying “a Mayor has to make decisions”. Good comment. But even that has been taken apart by a Barack-backing Chicago newspaper columnist who called it racist “putting small town people against the rest of us.” Really, this is not made up, it’s really written and allowed to see print in a daily newspaper.

Pundits are now accusing the McCain-Palin camp of declaring war on the media.

I think it’s the other way around. John McCain repeatedly asked Barack Obama to meet and debate anytime, anywhere. Obama agreed and then refused to hold such face-to-face debates, with the exception of meeting on the 4th of July when no one would be watching.

Where was the critical media?

John McCain stated that he would limit himself to public financing in the presidential campaign. Barack Obama agreed, but reneged on the agreement when he saw he could raise more money. Where was the media criticism?

The pundits are calling for full investigations into Governor Palin’s past, but where were they in looking into Senator Obama’s past connections with unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers, or convicted developer/fundraiser Tony Rezko and all the failed developments he placed in Obama’s district while Obama served in the Illinois Senate?

When did they demand probes into Barack Obama’s ties – and $800,000 campaign payments—to the far-left Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, ACORN, a group accused of hiring forgery convicts, offering gifts to sign up voters, falsifying driver’s license numbers, Social Security numbers, and other information on fraudulent voter registration cards. Where are the calls for investigations from reporters and columnists? And why weren’t they calling for those investigations months ago?

One day after Governor Sara Palin gave her remarkable address to the convention, national reporters were demanding that she appear on television news shows, do one-on-one interviews, give full access to the press. Did they ask Senator Biden to do the same the day after he spoke in Denver?

This campaign year stands out as wild – with too many members of the media lost in the forest of blatant bias. Has the noble fourth estate now joined the nominating wing of the Democratic Party?

**
Mary Laney is a regular columnist for the Chicago Daily Observer

Commentary:

1

Chris Carney says:

I think your article leaves out an entire 50% of the equation.

"No sooner had Senator McCain announced Governor Palin as his Vice Presidential choice, the attacks began."

To be fair, the announcement also triggered a concerted effort to cram sunshine down our throats. I think this entire episode was clearly a free-for-all on both sides.

September 8, 2008 at 9:32 a.m.
2

Pat Hickey says:

Great and cogent report from a professional journalist - and there are few and far between picking up pay in American Media these days.

The insight to Sen. Biden is telling - DNC retreat first - explain later agenda demonstrates the fundamental inability of Progressives to connect to the American People.

Sarah Palin just might be the best thing to happen in American politics because her nomination and the subsequent oafing by CNN, The Chicago Tribune, Suntimes and especially MSNBC and NBC News angered Americans.

Well done Ms. Laney!

September 8, 2008 at 10:05 a.m.
3

Bob says:

Now when all the examples of Obama corruption from his beginning at the Davis Law firm until he got involved with Rezko and his corrupt Iraq buddies and the black muslims he placed all over his campaigns, as well as his partnership with Aires where they gave over $100,000,000 to people who were in no way involved with Chicago education.
You will see a daily example of one corrupt association after another.

September 8, 2008 at 12:27 p.m.
4

Pat Hickey says:

Bob,

That ain;t the half of it!

September 8, 2008 at 12:35 p.m.
5

Roger says:

Both parties have been sexist. Both have been unfairly dismissive of small town mayors and community organizers.
However Biden and Palin are in no way comparable. Biden is a known Senate veteran. Palin is an unknown rockstar. Calls for her to get in front of the media and actually speak for herself (instead of relying on the internet rumor mill) were completely justified.

More Obama rumors here: http://tinyurl.com/6jb7l6

September 8, 2008 at 1:33 p.m.
6

Kris says:

Roger - wow, you couldn't be more on the target about "know Senate Veteran and rockstar" with Obama and McCain...could have sworn those are the names you meant to say, right?

September 8, 2008 at 2:39 p.m.
7

John says:

Wow.

Let's look at Palin's foreign policy decisions? SHE DOESN'T HAVE ANY!

It amazes me that people take "too inexperienced" as an unfair attack when we're talking about a person with no opinion on the War in Iraq, no exposure to foreign policy or national domestic concerns.

This is really what we want to be standing up and fighting for? My God, anyone is qualified to be President.

September 8, 2008 at 2:55 p.m.
8

Bill Baar says:

No opinion on the war in Iraq?

She's sending her son. That says alot about a mother's opinion.

September 8, 2008 at 4:05 p.m.
9

Richard says:

Right on Bill Baar! I couldn't have said it better myself.

September 8, 2008 at 11:56 p.m.
10

Jim says:

What a hilarious sight to watch the Republican Party in St. Paul repudiating the nearly eight-year record of the Republican Party in Washington, and then asking us to trust the Republican Party to extricate the nation from the mess the Republican Party has created.

September 9, 2008 at 12:08 a.m.
11

Deekie says:

What a hilarious sight to watch the Democratic Party in Denver proclaiming their untested nominee to be the son of Zeus at a mock Greek revival temple!

At least he knows about repairing toilets and creating slums from his days as a community organizer and a state legislator.

September 9, 2008 at 10:22 a.m.
12

Jim says:

This is what you guys left for us, What a proud legacy! our children and our grandchildren's grandchildren thank you, thats how long it will take to pay for it.

"Aside from Big Oil and Texas, bad news covers the nation like a protracted heat wave. The Russians are buying up our iconic houses, the emirates are buying up our iconic buildings...Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to founder--their shares are down more than 80 percent this year. Together they own or guarantee almost half of this country's home mortgages, a sum that comes to more than $5 trillion. Upwards of 300 regional banks are in danger of complete collapse, putting a further strain on the 75-year-0ld Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which will have to step in to shore them up. In the skies a number of major airlines are desperately trying to save fuel....Even gambling, America's true national pastime, is off. Casino operator Wynn Resorts announced that its Las Vegas business plunged about 70 percent in the second quarter of this year...the market capitalization of Ford and General Motors has dropped so sharply that it would take nine of each to make one company with the value of Toyota. Yes, my friends, courtesy of Bush & Co."

--Graydon Carter, Vanity

September 9, 2008 at 5:57 p.m.
13

John Powers says:

"Aside from Big Oil and Texas" and manufacturing and agriculture and a whole host of other industries that are doing better than ever.

And a country that has not had a terrorist attack in 7 years, and has pretty much won the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Cutting and pasting from Leftists at Vanity Fair has to be one of the least persuasive arguments in politics.

JBP

September 9, 2008 at 6:22 p.m.
14

Jim for the truth says:

The MSM cost 3,000 more US troop deaths as Harvard Study showed;
Have any of you seen the below study from the mainstream media?
The Harvard study shows which asked:
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling
for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The short answer: is YES !
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php...
STUDY ABSTRACT
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces,
we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas
with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical
of the war. We find in periods after a spike in war-critical statements, insurgent attacks
increases by 5-10 percent. The results suggest that insurgent groups respond rationally
to expected probability of US withdrawal."
The MSM took statements like these:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "War is lost",
[ nothing but music to the ears of the thug/barbarians.]
U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
[Who loved to here that.. our troops?]
Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
[So local Iraqis hearing this would support the thug/barbarians wouldn't you?]
The MSM is more disgusting then just their biased Palin information.

September 9, 2008 at 6:41 p.m.
15

Jim says:

Now that the war has been "won," pardon me if I ask a few questions.

One. If the war has been won, why is it that because of security concerns Condi Rice's recent visit to Iraq was kept secret until the very last moment? If the enemy has been vanquished, why would this be necessary?

My second question. If the war has been won, why hasn't the Iraqi government been brave enough to show itself in public? It still hunkers down in the Green Zone.

My third question. How were a mere 20,000 troops able to do so much? Is it because the real reason for the drop in violence is the hundreds of millions of dollars the U.S. is paying militants not to shoot people.

According to a report in USA Today, the U.S. hired 36,000 former militants at $8 per day to help us--and that's just what the U.S. pays the grunts. Who would know how much we are paying the leaders and the Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr to be nice?

Using the figures in the USA Today article, 365-day coverage with all 36,000 comes to roughly $2,016,000 per week or about $105,000,000 per year. And again, that's just for the low-level people.

In a subsequent article on the subject by The New York Times, it is reported that these Sunni insurgents on the U.S. payroll are now being hunted down by the Shia government. Understandably, the turn-coats feel betrayed by the U.S.

Yet The New York Times article on the surge and Bush's courage did not tell us about the huge protection racket the U.S. has been engaged in, and the real reason behind the drop in American casualties.

One final thought. If 20,000 troops can do so much, too bad we didn't know that in Korea or Viet Nam. Those wars could have been won with a surge, too.

September 9, 2008 at 8:59 p.m.

Comments are closed for this entry