Home » Featured, Headline

What’s Cooking? Pension Reform Sizzles in Illinois

John Powers 8 July 2010 6 Comments

No one likes a good story about pensions to get his heat pumping as much as I do, or if you are Rich Miller, it gets your blood boiling to have Illinois referred to as “Greece by the Lake Michigan” in the New York Times (after consultation with the decidedly non-Greek. and coincidentally primary candidate Dan Hynes, of all people). Miller wants to know who said that, which probably won’t fix the budget and pension problems in Illinois, so I thought we could go on a different tack.

I am a big proponent of cookouts with neighbors. There is something about smoked meats and lukewarm beer that makes our middle aged conversations spill over to pensions and retirement after about the second round. Two of our neighbors being teachers, one retired couple and one near retirement, bring a lot of “gross hyperbole” (Rich Miller’s term) into any discussion about teachers pensions in Illinois. So pull up a lawn chair, grab a Bud Light Lime and join in the discussion here.

1) Our retired neighbors, suburban school district have explained that the State of Illinois, and not the local school district is on the hook for any pension payments to retirees AND medical insurance. So naturally local school districts bump up salaries when an employee nears retirement age, so that the final pension calculation is a high one, billed to the state and not the school district. Our near retirement age neighbor says, yup, works fine for her. Dan Hynes (him again!) thinks that practice has ended. But the Tribune thinks it still goes on. It seems abusive to me, but where does this stand?

2) The State has been very generous with offering (and even mandating) pensions over the years, but miserly in paying into pension funds. A sharp guy, Professor Joshua Rauh, at Northwestern (could be a neighbor, must invite him over to next cookout, Sunday evening, beef brisket, if you are interested) was kind enough to provide the following scale.

Total (education related) Pensions paid out in 2009 $3.7 Billion
Total property tax revenue was $20B in 2007.

So about 18% of property taxes is consumed by pension payouts (not deposits on future pensions).

How about medical coverage? Total payout including medical was $5.3 Billion in 2006, so the number is more like 25% of property taxes being consume by pension and benefit payouts. That is as above, just paying out 25% not contributing to some imaginary pension fund. So if your taxes are $10,000 per year on your homestead, $2,500 goes to NOT teaching the neighborhood children to read, write etc.

3) But we do have a professionally run pension system, the TRS, in Illinois, right? Well the TRS is all huffy that Tony Rezko and Stuart Levine (neither of Greek heritage to the best of my knowledge) were mixed up in their investment schemes, so was Bob Kjellander (who seems like a good guest at a cookout, despite it all).

Since giving Levine the heave-ho, TRS has proceeded to invest in Credit Default Swaps (CDS). Any of you teachers at our virtual cookout pleased with the performance of Credit Default Swaps? TRS lost $4.4 billion by investing in 2009 (we would have been $105 Million ahead by investing in T-Bills). Love them or hate them, wouldn’t the bad press that CDS have received over the last 3 years make TRS shy away? The S&P 500 was up 23% in 2009….that would have gone a long way ($6 Billion or so) toward filling in the pension holes, WITHOUT investing in CDS.

4) While we’re on the subject, why does the State fund Teacher Pensions to begin with? Why don’t the local school boards just pay for it themselves out of property tax? Chicago is on a different Teacher pension system, CTPF, where do they get the money to fund their pensions…ah transparency please, on page 16/104 of the 2008 annual report for CTPF, it is suggested that the “the employer and state were required to make additional contributions in the amount $20,812,000 during fiscal year 2008″ so there must be some State input as well. How much? When does the state kick in?

5) Another guy quick with the wit and the pie chart, Laurence Msall from the Civic Federation has a few more comparisons. Every person in Chicago (man, woman, child) has a liability $5821 towards pension payments to various Chicago government retirees, including teachers. That is the unfunded liability, on an ongoing basis. Including State worker pensions, total per capita unfunded liability for the public pension funds supported by Chicago residents was $10,037 in fiscal year 2008, up from $2,442 in fiscal year 2000…..begging the question, How much does every person in Chicago (or Rockford or DeWitt) pay each year, if pensions were fully funded?

I’ll do this part of the math, $588 per person is spent on pensions OUTSIDE of Chicago each year on education alone. Now put in police, fire, prison guards, and we get…anyone? Remember our TRS system is losing money, so there really is no gain to be had from keeping money there for safe keeping.

I have way too many apples to oranges comparisons above (one too many Bud Light Limes) but the proposition is out there. About 25% of our property taxes go towards retirees (if you quit cost shifting, for sanity’s sake). The State of Illinois is in a credit category better than Greece (rest easy Rich Miller) but worse than Portugal or Michigan. Is this the way we want the State of Illinois pensions to run?

Comments very welcome…(provided you don’t say, there isn’t a pension problem there is a problem that Illinois has not funded pensions, duh, that will get you booted from this cookout)

**

John Powers is the Executive Chef at the Chicago Daily Observer.

image Smoked Beef Brisket

6 Comments »

  • Dan Kelley said:

    Oooh… To quote the late Paul Powell, I can smell the meat a’cookin’

    Lukewarm beer? Make mine Pabst Blue Ribbon Beer… Yowsa!

  • Anne Leary said:

    Thanks for taking a stab at it. Whether apple or oranges comparisons or not it is a stunning exercise.

    Maybe offer extra citrus in the beer for a wake-up

  • Gregg said:

    As a recently retired suburban teacher depending on the Teachers’ Retirement System, my goose may be barbecued anyway, but health insurance is on retirees, not on the TRS. For example, it would cost me just about $3k per month to insure my family of four in the Teacher Retirement System plan. Lucky for me, my old district allows retirees to stay in the district group for health insurance, and they subsidize our premiums a little (to help get us out the door and off their books). It’s kind of like COBRA. Subsidy aside, the important thing for me is being in the district group; that saves me a lot of dough.

    Now as far as the bumps up in salary over the last few years of teaching go, they are still ON. Here’s the deal: Teachers who plan to retire announce their intention to do so 3 years in advance. Over the final 3 years their raises cannot exceed 6%, year over year, starting from their base salary at the beginning of the last 4 years. That’s pretty good (a beer is about 6%, right?), but it is not all gravy. Here’s why: The teachers who are not planning to retire may get 2 to 3% a year in raises anyway, and in my case they got much more than that. In addition, if you wanted to start to coach or to teach summer school, you cannot. You cannot exceed the 6% increase year over year. Not exactly punitive, though, is it? That makes the average salary over the last 4 years about 10% more than the base salary at the start of the 4 years. And that 4-year average is the number that is used to figure your pension. The boost is not nothing, but in my case it’s not a whole lot more than I would get without the 6% each year; the district raises were significant.

    I am grateful for the support taxpayers have provided over the years. No complaints at all. Now, like you, I wonder how in the world this pension mess is going to be resolved. It’s not like we’re not taxed enough! As for me with 2 kids still at home, I have no plans to stop working and will be trying to find out how to prepare for the flare ups that surely will be coming. I don’t want to be toast!

  • Bill Baar said:

    Credit Default swaps…geez…don’t the fund managers have some rules…isn’t there a board looking at these guys?

  • Mark said:

    I think this is an interesting and important debate. I am a recently retired teacher in the TRS system, and yes, I did receive a “bump” in salary that did help increase th monthly pension payment I now receive. What hasn’t been mentioned here is the reason I received the bump was to get me to retire early. This opens up jobs for younger teachers coming into the market. I would have made much more money than the bump if I had worked until 65. Also, you should inlcude in your math that every paycheck I received for thirty four years had nearly 10 percent deducted for TRS. Many believe we get the pension payments just because we were teachers. They don’t realize that we paid into the system with every paycheck we received. The state was not so conscientious about paying their portion, and that amount wisely invested over thirty years should more than pay for what I receive now.

  • John Powers (author) said:

    Mark,

    Thanks for your reply.

    How does you retiring early save the taxpayers money? They have to hire someone else to replace you, pay both of your health care benefits, and pay your bumped up pension..plus the pay raises and pensions hikes that will occur over both of your careers?

    The paycheck you received was paid for by the taxpayers. We only see 1 number going to compensate a public school teacher, which is the total of your healthcare, retirement, and salary etc. How that breaks down is not really all that important to the taxpayer, as the total package is what you work for, not just one bucket of payment or another.

    I appreciate your reply, but there needs to be more information on how these early retirement programs have panned out. My estimate is that they have been a disaster, but as above, more research needs to be done.

    Thanks,
    JBP

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.