Home » Featured, Headline

Trumpian Guilt and Amnesia

Don Rose 7 March 2017 3 Comments

Pop psychologists sometimes identify specialized guilty consciences, such as Jewish guilt, Catholic guilt, Freudian guilt and so on. Add to this impressive list a wave of Trumpian guilt, the main symptom of which is amnesia. (Trump’s delusional wiretap to one side.)


We have now seen a string of Trumpians, ranging from the deplorable Michael Flynn to Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions to son-in-law-in-chief Jared Kushner, plus a few lesser lights, none of whom admitted they had met with Russian officials until they got caught–and once caught could not recall what they talked about.

These are guilty consciences of the Trumpian species because it could have been very easy–except in Flynn’s case–to have acknowledged the meetings immediately and given plausible explanations having nothing to do with the specter of collusion in bringing down Hillary Clinton or lifting sanctions in exchange.

Most of the suspects met with Putin’s Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, well known on the Washington scene as a socializer, party-giver and intelligence gatherer–perhaps spymaster. Through the years he has met and schmoozed with numerous major public officials, from presidents to congresspersons to cabinet members. That’s what ambassadors do.

But ever since the apparent Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee and John Podesta, with embarrassing emails slowly doled out to Wikileaks, meetings with him take on a sinister tone, so everyone keeps it a secret–suggesting a pandemic of guilty consciences .

On the other hand, what if Sessions had answered the question as to whether he had contact with any big-time Russians by saying “Well of course as a senator I have occasion to meet numerous ambassadors and diplomats such as Ambassador Kislyak, some of whom want to introduce themselves or ask my position on an issue or even make a suggestion to me. I met Ambassador Kislyak a couple of times–as I recall, among other matters, he was curious as to how the election was going or wondered whether, if elected, how soon Trump might want to meet with President Putin.”

Logical enough–and quite innocent. Especially since there is no transcript of the conversations. Instead, he lied–never mentioned Kislyak until found out, then went blank on the content. Trumpian guilty conscience.

Same option with Kushner: “The Ambassador wanted to introduce himself, knowing I am a key advisor to the president, so I had then-National Security Advisor Flynn join me for a brief introductory meeting–a getting-to-know-you session.”

Again, logical, innocent–and no transcripts. But he admitted nothing until caught.

Flynn’s case was different. He got caught talking to a suspected Russky intelligence officer because the line was tapped. Then he lied about discussing lifting sanctions, but there was a transcript to cure his amnesia. Rachel Maddow noted that the feds could not have listened in unless there was a FISA warrant enabling the wiretap, suggesting some larger investigation involving Flynn was already in progress.

Leading to the obvious question: if all these meetings and conversations were innocent, why didn’t the Trumpians disclose it themselves, giving rational explanations?

Paraphrasing Hamlet on conscience and cowards, Trumpian guilt made amnesiacs of them all. Cowards, too.

Don Rose is a regular contributor to Chicago Daily Observer

image FIFA (not FISA) Soccer Ball



  • George Smith said:

    We DO know ONE thing Mr. Rose… General Flynn WAS subjected to a wiretap and the contents of his conversations were overheard… the issue is WHO ordered it, where are the Court documents that requested it, WHO conducted it, and WHO ordered the results of it to be shared with all of our “Intelligence Agencies”… the answer, at least as to the last item is Barack Hussein Obama…

  • Walter Concrete said:

    Fairly thin gruel from Mister Rose once again. The Clintons sold massive US uranium reserves to the Russians, but the Democrats did not raise an eyebrow.

    One of US Senator Sessions’ alleged two meetings with the Russians occurred at a diplomatic reception hosted by President Obama. Sessions and the Russian ambassador were in a large crowd, but the Dems want to spin this as a clandestine meeting. Seriously.

    Get real!

  • The Russians Are Coming said:

    How quickly we forget how the American Left used to be reliable apologists for the former Soviet Union and the Communist Party!

    It is so much easier to blame foreign intrigue and computer hacks (none of which have been confirmed with solid evidence) for Hillary R. Clinton’s loss rather than acknowledge that she was an abysmal and scandal plagued candidate, who failed to make many public appearances, neglected campaigning in the Rust Belt and got swept in battleground states and states that had not gone Republican since Reagan was the candidate.

    Hillary R. Clinton was a divisive figure who botched presidential campaigns against both Obama (2008) and Trump (2016). She squandered a substantial lead in the polls and a significant cash advantage. Instead of campaigning in Michigan or Wisconsin, HRC opted to spend an estimated $4 million on her Election Night party at the Javits Center.

    Get over it!

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.