Home » Featured, Headline

Parasitic Press Ponders Lack of Proper Statesmen

Pat Hickey 13 August 2010 7 Comments

Illinois’s premier political info warehouse Capitol Fax Blog is managed by Rich Miller who has a column for the Chicago Sun Times. Today Mr. Miller laments the lack of statesmen in politics – well there are statesmen but they are all too often crooks like Charley Rangel, the late Dan Rostenkowski, and so many other talented ‘sharp’ guys and gals.
Miller weeps -

“It’s tragic for Illinois that true statesmen such as Ryan and Rostenkowski turned out to be crooked. Their nefarious behavior led directly to Rod Blagojevich’s rise to power. Blagojevich won Rostenkowski’s old congressional seat in the 1996 Democratic backlash and ran mostly against George Ryan when he defeated Jim Ryan in the 2002 gubernatorial election.

That didn’t work out so well, in case you hadn’t noticed. Let’s just keep our fingers crossed that Blagojevich’s jurors somehow find a way to put that man where he belongs.

And now here we are, stuck with an accidental governor who can’t seem to get anything done and a Republican opponent who appears unable to grasp the very real crisis we find ourselves in. And Brady has never been mentioned as a statesman.
It’s enough to make me want to scream.

Isn’t there anybody left out there who can play this game who isn’t also a crook? Anybody?”

Dry them up there Mr. Miller! What you have said above is not tragic it is comic according to the laws of dramaturgy – comedy happens to worst of people and tragedy happens to the best of people. Blago Tragic? Miller, Please!
Rich Miller is like some goof who got bobby pins, screws, bolts and wire caught up into the vacuum cleaner drive belt and snapped it, because he was too lazy to bend over and pick the items and them cursed the machine. Rich Miller is in denial.
The problem of denial in politics evolves when a steady diet of horse manure no longer makes the moral palate recoil from one like Rich Miller who will gladly proclaim -

  • Sheila Simon is really the best we have in Illinois
  • SEIU is A Labor Union and not a Marxist PAC operated by university spawned technicians like Keith Keliher, while staking a man out with labor bona fides as a Judas Goat -like Tom Balanoff.
  • Dan Shoman is a genius – look what he did for Obama and now for Alexi!
  • Ralph Martire is NOT a Progressive Shill for every tax in the last fifteen years.
  • GLBTQ Activists have not made a concerted effort to take over the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District as a path to Progressive power – saying that is just hateful.

Let’s take a look at our Capital example of Illinois denial – President Obama. Barack Obama was shilled by Dan Shomon on orders from Dave Axelrod and got Obama all the way to the White House with the help of Billy Ayers, SEIU’s Andy Stern, Tony Rezko, Jan Schakowsky, Forrest Claypool Rod Blagojevich, Abner Mikva, Allison Davis and Dawn Clark Netsch as well as Boss Mike Madigan, Rich Daley, John Stroger, and the thousands of Ward foot soldiers that make Progressives itch, unless they need help. Statesmanship Mr. Miller?

Well, I always believed that Barack Obama was brought along way too quickly – what do I know?
President Obama is in way over his head – Here is a British point of view on the Obama Presidency:

1. The Obama presidency is out of touch with the American people

In a previous post I noted how the Obama presidency increasingly resembles a modern-day Ancien Régime, extravagant, decaying and out of touch with ordinary Americans. The First Lady’s ill-conceived trip to Spain at a time of widespread economic hardship was symbolic of a White House that barely gives a second thought to public opinion on many issues, and frequently projects a distinctly elitist image. The “let them eat cake” approach didn’t play well over two centuries ago, and it won’t succeed today.
2. Most Americans don’t have confidence in the president’s leadership
This deficit of trust in Obama’s leadership is central to his decline. According to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll, “nearly six in ten voters say they lack faith in the president to make the right decisions for the country”, and two thirds “say they are disillusioned with or angry about the way the federal government is working.” The poll showed that a staggering 58 per cent of Americans say they do not have confidence in the president’s decision-making, with just 42 per cent saying they do.
3. Obama fails to inspire
In contrast to the soaring rhetoric of his 2004 Convention speech in Boston which succeeded in impressing millions of television viewers at the time, America is no longer inspired by Barack Obama’s flat, monotonous and often dull presidential speeches and statements delivered via teleprompter. From his extraordinarily uninspiring Afghanistan speech at West Point to his flat State of the Union address, President Obama has failed to touch the heart of America. Even Jimmy Carter was more moving.

and more

There is a distinctly Titanic-like feel to the Obama presidency and it’s not hard to see why. The most left-wing president in modern American history has tried to force a highly interventionist, government-driven agenda that runs counter to the principles of free enterprise, individual freedom, and limited government that have made the United States the greatest power in the world, and the freest nation on earth.

This, combined with weak leadership both at home and abroad against the backdrop of tremendous economic uncertainty in an increasingly dangerous world, has contributed to a spectacular political collapse for a president once thought to be invincible. America at its core remains a deeply conservative nation, which cherishes its traditions and founding principles. President Obama is increasingly out of step with the American people, by advancing policies that undermine the United States as a global power, while undercutting America’s deep-seated love for freedom.

Hype is not Hope. SEIU is not a labor union – it is a PAC and a very dangerous one at that. A Real Statesman ignores the media and the media hate him – in Illinois that would be Mike Madigan, or a Bill Brady, or a Jim Durkin, or a Kevin Joyce – now departed from the horse manure banquet. The media are addicted to equine refuse – Statesmen need meat, spuds, greens and beans.

Denial ain’t a river in Egypt, Mr. Miller. That’s the Nile.

**

Pat Hickey is a regular contributor to the Chicago Daily Observer

7 Comments »

  • John Powers said:

    I’ll add this Pat,

    Miller is an excellent reporter but lame analyst (and worse editor than even I am) and his lameness is infectious.

    Here’s Steve Rhodes going lame at Beachwood

    “Beachwood: But we have such terrible candidates now in both the governor’s and U.S. Senate race, isn’t it even more depressing?

    Eisendrath: So what! Our democracy will survive, our country will survive. It’s depressing as all get-out but we have what we have.”

    Both Brady and Quinn are experienced, successful politicians, and have quite a bit of talent to offer the State. The Democrats had a strong primary challenge from Dan Hynes, while the Republican primary was a battle-royale of responsible adults wanting to lead our State. This is “depressing”?

    The fact that Rhodes and Miller have been complicit in getting us some of the lemons that lead our state and country today, sort of disqualifies them from respect on this issue.

  • Dan Kelley said:

    I think Miller’s lack of objectivity is due to the fact that he wants to be a participant in the political process and he is not a neutral.

    The late Steve Neal suffered from the same delusions. Neal also enjoyed dining and drinking with Rostenkowski at various pricy steakhouses.

  • John Powers said:

    DK,
    I am fine with Colonel McCormickism in the media and try my best to drive the Observer in that direction. It is the one the one hand/on the other hand type of analysis that stinks.

    If Rich/Steve etc are participants, then they have some responsibility for that political process, rather than jumping in and out depending on when you want to be analytical just flunks.

    JBP

  • Dan Kelley said:

    JBP:

    I have no objection to “sheets” have a political affiliation and a partisan outlook. In former days, the Tribune and the Daily News were openly Republican while the Sun-Times was unabashedly liberal. Readers knew this and could make their purchases accordingly.

    What I object to is the hypocrisy of folks like Rich Miller who claim to be unbiased neutrals when they are anything but. These types play favorites and mislead the public by posing as paragons of civic virtue when they are merely partisans.

    Having a political preference or slant is fine, but my objection is to those who refuse to be open and upfront about it.

    DK

  • Pat Hickey said:

    John,

    While Steve Rhodes might take a path less taken than most of the Cdobs enthusiasts, he is a wildly principled gentleman and inkslinger and nothing if not fair. Mr. Miller has proven himself to be wildly partisan yet protests too much.

    Steve Rhodes on the other hand stuck his neck on the ethical block.

    Rhodes’s a bawcock, and a heart of gold,
    A lad of life, an imp of fame;
    Of parents good, of fist most valiant.
    I kiss his dirty shoe, and from heart-string
    I love the lovely bully!

  • John Powers said:

    I only refer to Rhodes whiney commentary on the “terrible” candidates….we have had enough puffed up lemons who have been squirted on to the national stage with sour results (the Flop Obama comes to mind) to have some discretion about who is a “terrible” candidate and who is an adult politician taking responsibility for governance.

    Hard workers, decent enough ethically, and upholders of a degree of dignity in the State of Illinois, Pat Quinn and Bill Brady are both pretty much the opposite of “terrible” candidates.

  • Bill Baar said:

    I don’t know about Rhodes, but I wish Miller had put some brakes on the Blagojevich’s impeachment instead of beating the drums for throwing the Guv out fast. If the jury hangs and the Guv walks it will be because there was a rush to judge by both Springfield and the Feds and I gotta wonder if it wasn’t a rush to protect the others guilty.

    I agree Quinn and Brady both seem decent guys. I wouldn’t lament them. They present a real choice. Rather than rush to judge, the media would do us a big favor slowing down the judgments.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.