<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Nationalization and Stimulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cdobs.com/archive/featured/of-nationalization-and-stimulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cdobs.com/archive/featured/of-nationalization-and-stimulation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Baar</title>
		<link>http://www.cdobs.com/archive/featured/of-nationalization-and-stimulation/comment-page-1/#comment-9789</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Baar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdobs.com/?p=2836#comment-9789</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Contrast it to President Barack Obama’s comment that nationalizing the banks as Sweden did is alien to our culture and traditions (but even he never quite said “never”).&lt;/em&gt;

No Jacksonian our Barack...   http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/bankveto.html &lt;em&gt;On the advice of Senators Clay and Webster, Nicholas Biddle, the president of the Bank of the United States, applied to Congress for a recharter bill in 1832, four years in advance of the expiration date of the old bill. The recharter bill passed, but Jackson vetoed it and the supporters of the bill were unable to gather enough votes to override the veto.

In this message, drafted by Amos Kendall, a member of Jackson\&#039;s \&quot;Kitchen Cabinet,\&quot; the President attacks the bank as undemocratic, monopolistic, parasitical, and, because it was controlled by foreigners, a danger to the future of the republic itself. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;em&gt;Contrast it to President Barack Obama’s comment that nationalizing the banks as Sweden did is alien to our culture and traditions (but even he never quite said “never”).&lt;/em&gt;</p>
<p>No Jacksonian our Barack&#8230;   <a href="http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/bankveto.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/bankveto.html</a> &lt;em&gt;On the advice of Senators Clay and Webster, Nicholas Biddle, the president of the Bank of the United States, applied to Congress for a recharter bill in 1832, four years in advance of the expiration date of the old bill. The recharter bill passed, but Jackson vetoed it and the supporters of the bill were unable to gather enough votes to override the veto.</p>
<p>In this message, drafted by Amos Kendall, a member of Jackson\&#8217;s \&quot;Kitchen Cabinet,\&quot; the President attacks the bank as undemocratic, monopolistic, parasitical, and, because it was controlled by foreigners, a danger to the future of the republic itself. &lt;/em&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Aquinas</title>
		<link>http://www.cdobs.com/archive/featured/of-nationalization-and-stimulation/comment-page-1/#comment-9700</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Aquinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdobs.com/?p=2836#comment-9700</guid>
		<description>If this interpretation of Stiglitz is correct..

\&quot;With federal ownership of a slew of banks, they can sort through all those obligations and net them out much easier than under private ownership\&quot;

it pretty much explains why Stiglitz is a laughable poser rather than a serious economist.  No one in their right mind thinks that the Feds are good at sorting out complicated financial transactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this interpretation of Stiglitz is correct..</p>
<p>\&quot;With federal ownership of a slew of banks, they can sort through all those obligations and net them out much easier than under private ownership\&quot;</p>
<p>it pretty much explains why Stiglitz is a laughable poser rather than a serious economist.  No one in their right mind thinks that the Feds are good at sorting out complicated financial transactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 208/214 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c963862.r62.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.cdobs.com @ 2012-02-09 07:01:04 -->
