Home » Featured, Headline

Do Re Mi Needed for Governor’s Race

Thomas F. Roeser 26 February 2010 No Comment

Raising Dough.

One of the first things handicappers use as they compare notes on viable candidates is the question: Can he raise dough? Up to now the answer on Bill Brady the all-but-declared-victor of the Republican gubernatorial nomination is decidedly no. All his primary campaigns were run on shoe-string budgets and this is no different from others. I’m not even sure he had a campaign manager during the primary although reportedly he has one now.

This is an important disadvantage for Brady. One of the first things that seasoned handicappers liked about Kirk Dillard was he can raise dough…not in the lavish amounts Andy McKenna, Jr. did through his old man’s deep pockets and bottomless contacts but satisfactorily enough to get through a general election. To be successful for governor a candidate should have $10 million either on hand or available for the scooping into his cache.

Of course idealistic right-to-lifers…some of whom endorsed Brady…think of nothing else but a 100% voting record aren’t interested in the ability to raise campaign money, essential to win elections. Not for them. Their scratch sheets showing 100% pro-life voting record is sufficient. For them big dough is what they shell out at a silent pro-life auctions in church basements: $50.

Let’s be polite and say that Brady is not nearly even in the distant neighborhood of collecting a couple million today–while Pat Quinn has coffers full from Big Labor and other liberal interests. For which we can all say: Thanks, Jim Ryan and Andy McKenna for your unpredictable entry into the primary which put us in this spot when without your entry there was a distinctly good chance Republicans could capture the governorship.

Theatre Helped Democrats.

Independents and the mainstream media want to show what they feel is “transparency” and “bipartisanship” which will enable them to feel that Barack Obama is making a good-will effort to work with Republicans…and on TV. But the real game was revealed just before the end of the 7-1/2 hours when Obama said that in the last analysis he will not tolerate “baby steps” and that if passage depends on just Democrats, so be it. Following the Blair House session, David Axelrod, the Obama courtier appeared on TV saying that the American people want a straight vote up or down on the issue. All of which means that there will indeed be a Herculean effort at “reconciliation”—the jam-through of a procedural vote to obviate the filibuster, starting with the House.

But House Democrats really don’t have the votes to pass it.

From the image standpoint, the Democrats helped themselves with independents and shored up their base. But whether they changed any votes to pass health care is undeterminable. Republicans showed up well, particularly Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Paul Ryan of Wisconsin…showing that they are not members of the “party of `no’” but have cogent ideas. In essence, both parties helped themselves but whether or not the Dems switched votes can’t be determined.


Tom Roeser is the Chairman of the Editorial Board of the Chicago Daily Observer

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.