Speaker Pelosi’s speech before the House today was remarkable, but not in a good way. She was trying to round up votes for a bailout package that shes claims to believe is essential for the stability of the American economy. She can’t, and doesn’t want to, pass the bill without a substantial number of Republican votes. So what does she do? You would think she would say, “let’s pass this emergency measure now, in the best interests of the country, and talk about who is to blame later.” Instead, Pelosi began her speech with a highly partisan tirade against “Bush” and “Republican” economic policies, which were allegedly to blame for this situation. She focused on an attack on the growth of federal deficits, which clearly are at best tangential to the current crisis. That, to me, is the sort of irresponsible thing you do when (a) you’re not claiming there is a vast emergency; and (b) you are in the minority, and not claiming to exercise leadership. [Commenters point out that Republican Housemember were acting equally irresponsibly to the extent they rose to Pelosi’s bait and voted against the bailout out of pique at Pelosi. True. But the Speaker of the House is a leader, not just a random member of the House, and her actions inevitably and justifiably get more scrutiny than those of her colleagues.
Read More of Did Pelosi Torpedo Bill with Partisan Attacks? off-site...Dan Kelley says:
In a parliamentary system of government, Pelosi would be asked to resign her position and call for a new election after failing on such a vote as this. For all practical purposes, Pelosi's failure amounts to a vote of no confidence.
Awful plastic surgery says:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D) comes across as a complete partisan fool after delivering such a ridiculous speech before such a critical vote. Any fair minded observers and commentators ought to lay the defeat of this bill outside of her office. You do not form a coalition by engaging in such decisive tactics.