Every day I meet Republicans who believe somehow that things are as good for them today as they were in the hey-day of the Reagan years…so they allow that if McCain is nominated, they would “hold their nose’ and they cannot abide Huckabee and Romney is a issues shifter.
They should understand that 2008 may well be 1974, the Watergate year, and they shouldn’t be so cocky but be glad that anybody of any quality decided to run for president on their party’s line. Americans regard the Democrats as more competent than the Republicans by a margin of 5 to 3, more ethical by 2 to 1. They prefer Democratic policies to Republican ones from healthcare to taxes. The economy may be tailing south. The Republicans have a Rudy Giuliani with too much personal baggage plus prostate cancer. Fred Thompson is the first actor candidate to pout people to sleep and also has a virulent for latent form of cancer. John McCain is the oldest candidate for president, has dormant cancer, a wife who stole money from a Third World charity she founded because she was hooked on drugs and who got a personal favor from the prosecutors which kept her out of jail.
McCain himself left his first wife because she lost her looks after being in a car wreck while he was in stir, picked up with a nifty looker multi-millionaire whose Daddy helped him run from Arizona, and who tried to kibosh the 1st amendment. Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee go together as well as the alumni from their respective schools-Harvard Business and Ouachita Baptist. Everybody but McCain thinks it’s nifty to send 12 million illegal Hispanics home at the same time pollsters are telling us the Latino vote is key.
Ron Paul is right there where the issues count: wanting to abolish the Food and Drug Administration, introducing a bill to de-Pasteurize milk, insisting the troops will be home by week’s end and the hell with what happens to the terrorists. If we only trade with the terrorists they’ll understand we mean no harm. Also what’s this stuff about the feds bombing the Trade Center in order to stir us up? He’s a joy: well, after all, what were the Twin Towers doing in Manhattan anyhow where they don’t belong? Standing there as twin sentinels they were…well…provocative, that’s what they were.
Besides, if we have any presence in the Middle East we’ll deserve what we get. Also the Federal Reserve isn’t written into the Constitution; therefore abolish it. I have one question: for a guy who raised that much on the Internet, what has he done with the dough? He’s right up there in the single digits. What’d he do with that brilliant staff of his, put it all in cardboard yard signs? Oh well, wait til he runs as a Libertarian again-being sure that he runs for reelection also to the House where he can continue the fight for term limits.
Many congressional Republicans have fallen prey to greed and lust; the Speaker looked the other way when one of his party members was importuning boy pages.
Oh we have every right to be choosy we do. Why shoot, man, we’re the majority party! Oh and by the way, there’s more similarity between Hillary Clinton and me than you’d imagine. Did you get that little repartee the other day? Nothing like being instructed by a kid who just started shaving about the nature of conservatism.
Yes, we have a lot to be picky about. And choosy. We’re big time stuff, we are. We Republicans.
Read More of Choosy and Picky: Tom Roeser on the Republicans off-site...john says:
Unpasturized milk, when on grass has near zero risk of pathogens. It is much healthier as the enzymes are not destroyed.
The federal reserve, should at least be accountable, as they can print as much money as they want, and yet are a private entity, that as citigroup just took on a major cash infusion, will be primarily owned by other nations.
Doing something so that the Chinese can not peg their currency to the dollar and eliminate the manufacturing base in the US might be a good idea, but then what do I know.
I think if you actually researched how some programs might be effected, the EPA, you might realize that his ideas for the most part are very sound.
Paul Figge says:
Zero = zero. Make fun buddy. Dr. Ron has the cure. Try to open your mind a little. Read and research Dr. Pauls message.
Me again says:
Is this even a serious blog? I can't spell very well either but boy your rant is bad. Why the sudden rage against Dr. Paul? This country needs help.
CDOBs Editors says:
Hi Ron Paul Supporters,
Rather than just being cheerleaders for Dr. Paul, how about a sensible response?
Do you actually think that abolishing the Federal Reserve should be a priority for the next president? Why? Would it be possible to reduce the influence of the Fed without abolishing it?
How do we counter terrorists without being engaged in overseas military operations? Should we wait till we are attacked again?
And per the money..has Dr. Pal fallen prey to the same disease that effects the media, thinking that raising money is equivalent to having political support? What to show for his contributors dollars?
The Libertarian movement would be much more serious if it tackled complex political questions rather than cheering Dr. Paul like the Sun Times (or Financial Times for that matter) blindly cheering Sen. Obama.
James Moore says:
I'm not even going to bother with a long diatribe. This swill isn't even worth it.
No good news, just complaints about the candidates, followed with a half-baked smear? Great stuff there Cronkite. Lots of substance for us readers to mull over.
Putz. I hope you aren't also about "those horribly mean Ron Paul supporters" too, after your comment board starts filling with angry comments.